I’ve had a good holiday and now I’m back in the tower and it’s a grey, rainy and windy lunchtime in Auckland. I can see the groundworks of our new building from here and the miserable weather is not affecting the builders. They’re out there sinking pillars into the ground for the foundations.
There are 10 cranes currently deployed and half-a-dozen trucks. I won’t bother with a photo today, but later this week, I’ll take a couple.
Thanks to my mate Gary in London, I have just this morning come to grips once again with Ethical Martini.
A lot’s happened over the antipodean summer, floods of “biblical” proportions that some take to be a sign; northern Africa is hotting up with protests; wild weather closing aiports across the US and Europe and this all on the back of an amazing flow of unrest across Europe throughout 2010. Maybe there’s something going on.
It seems that the security services seem to think so.
There’s an amazing story out of the UK about police infiltration of the British Greens. It’s a mind-boggling plot and a sinister reminder that we do indeed live in a surveillance society.
Simon Jenkins writes in the Guardian that a secret and semi-private police security unit [APCO] is infiltrating political groups and acting as agents provocateur:
A culture of perpetual fear has become so ingrained in government that nobody dares question any spending to which the word security can be attached. Last month these same agencies gave Britons their annual Christmas present, a day of planted headlines screaming, “al-Qaida threat to Christmas shopping”. It capped a year of “cuts threat to child protection” and “cuts threat to Olympic safety”. The only consequence of the Christmas stories would have been to scare people off going shopping. They must cost London shops millions in lost or deflected sales.
It seems this elite group is beyond any judicial or political control and runs as a semi-autonomous business. Isn’t this how death squads operate?
It trades on its own account, generating revenue by selling data from the police national computer for £70 an item (cost of retrieval, 60p). It owns an estate of 80 flats in central London.
This is amazing, privately on-selling data on protesters and others at a huge mark-up and then investing that money in illegal spying operations against activists. What a great business model — the surveillance economy — in full-swing.
The other story of note that Gary alerted me to is the US government demanding access to an Icelandic politician’s Twitter account to assist its investigation of Wikileaks.
Birgitta Jónsdóttir, an MP for the Movement in Iceland, revealed last week that the US justice department had asked Twitter to hand over her information. The US authorities are trying to build a criminal case against the website after its huge leaks of classified US information.
“[It is] very serious that a foreign state, the United States, demands such personal information of an Icelandic person, an elected official,” the interior minister, Ogmundur Jonasson, told Icelandic broadcaster RUV. “This is even more serious when put [in] perspective and concerns freedom of speech and people’s freedom in general,” he added.
The article by Dominic Rushe of the Guardian, also raises concerns that the Justice department might also be seeking information from Google, Facebook and other social networking sites to rope in Wikileaks’ contributors and supporters.
The surveillance power of social networks is now being exposed. I’ve long felt that this issue was under reported and not really taken seriously by proponents of social media evangelism.
These technologies can be easily turned into tools of social control and that’s what seems to be happening. We’ve been aware of it in China for some time and thankfully Chinese activists and pro-democracy groups are finding their way around some of the blocks.
It is the telescreen from 1984. Orwell foresaw the two-way nature of these applications and how they could be used to ferret out dissidents and to quash unrest.
Winston is painfully aware of the telescreen, which is both a receiver and transmitter at the same time. It incessantly relays messages from the Party and simultaneously allows the dreaded “thought police” to tune into the activities of any individual at any given time. The administration is divided among four Ministries- the Ministry of Truth, which deals with news, entertainment, education and fine arts, the Ministry of Love which maintains law and order, the Ministry of Peace which wages war and the Ministry of Plenty which handles economic affairs. The very vocabulary of the people was under Party Control; a system called “newspeak” was encouraged. One of the most dreaded words in the arsenal of Newspeak was the most heinous offence according to the Party – that of “thoughtcrime” which was sure to be punished by the Thought police. [summary from the Literature Network]
‘Thoughtcrime’, we commit it every day. Social networks are the new telescreen and in this case Western governments and many others I’m sure, are actively gathering data from social media to use for political and security means.
How long before we’re all branded as potential terror suspects?
So, I’m really grateful that Wikileaks is around and that Gary sent me another great piece about how Wikileaks is being slandered and subject to a constant, well-funded black-ops propaganda campaign by the US and other governments.
Glenn Greenwald’s piece in Salon canvases a range of important issues here, including freedom of speech and the hypocrisy of the US government over its treatment of Wikileaks and the newspapers that published extracts from the cables.
More importantly perhaps, Greenwald makes the point that it is the nature of the relationship between Wikileaks and its newspaper and media partners which really tells the story:
…there is a full-scale government/media campaign to demonize the group through outright fiction of the type that sold the nation on Iraq’s WMD stockpiles and Al Qaeda alliance. The undeniable truth from the start is that, with very few exceptions, WikiLeaks has only been publishing those cables which its newspaper partners first publish (and WikiLeaks thereafter publishes the cables with the redactions applied by those papers). This judicious editorial process — in which WikiLeaks largely relies on the editorial judgment of these newspapers for what to release — was detailed more than a month ago by the Associated Press.
This is fascinating and I’ve not seen it explained anywhere else. It is a great move on Wikileaks’ part and shows a level of integrity that the MSM does not often apply, as Greenwald points out in relation to the Guardian‘s own treatment of this story.
The Orwellian undertones that link these three recent events are clear enough; the question is what do we do about it?
I’m certainly going to be mulling on this over the next few months and it’s a theme I will return to over the year.
For now though, if you still need a bit of holiday mood as you ease into the year, or if you’re cut off by wild weather, snow, floods or other natural disasters, you might contemplate a bit of reading.
May I suggest two downloadable and free sci-fi novels by Cory Doctorow.
These two books capture the mood I was trying to invoke here. The dialectic between pessimism and optimism in relation to the political realities of earth circa the ‘new 20s’
Little Brother [download for free]
For the win [download for free]
Little Brother is a great story of surveillance and resistance against ‘homeland security’; For the win is about how we might make revolution today.
Both are excellent.