WE LIVE IN a democracy, right?
It just seems like common sense, something so secure and simple it’s hardly worth thinking about, right?
But what if I told you that what we have is not a democracy?
Would you be outraged? Would you think I’m some sort of unhinged leftie? Or would you be prepared to at least consider my arguments?
I’ll assume the latter, because you’re still reading. Aren’t you?
My argument, in a nutshell, is that despite the formal features of our political system matching most aspects of the dictionary definition, any sense of real democratic practice is an illusion. This is because our apparently democratic institutions are functionally designed to give power to money, not people.
Let’s start with an example from last week.
We will, or we will not, sell the ABC
I don’t know about you, but I was not at all surprised when the Liberal Party’s Federal Council voted overwhelmingly to sell-off the embattled national broadcaster at its annual conference on the weekend of 16-17 June.
The Liberal Party apparatus has been captured by conservative forces inspired by the Institute of Public Affairs and loyal to factions led by Tony Abbott in NSW, Peter Dutton in Queensland and Eric Abetz in Tasmania.
We can only expect this rightward drift to continue into the future, too. Moderates were roundly defeated in votes for the incoming executive and the Young Liberals grouping engineered the vote. The overlap between wealthy student apparatchiks and the besuited, bespectacled cadre of the IPA is very evident in the ranks of the Young Libs.
No delegates spoke against the sell motion, not even the several ministers who were present.
So, we can assume from this that the Liberal Party rank-and-file are committed to privatising the ABC and probably SBS as well.
Okay, we might disagree with this policy position (here at IA we certainly do), but in a democracy, the people have spoken.
In this case, the people are members of the Liberal Party — they elect a leadership, set policy and pre-select party candidates to stand in elections.
Yep, all totally democratic — except for the fact that the parliamentary grouping of the Liberals have said they will ignore the party’s rank-and-file.
The parliamentary wing of the Liberal Party has apparently been wedged by the conservative wing of the party. In the days after the Federal Council, senior Liberal ministers, from the PM down, were publicly vocal in claiming the Government has no plans to privatise the ABC.
That’s right, the Liberal Party representatives in Parliament – those whose positions on the comfy leather benches depends on the party rank-and-file – have no intention of carrying out party policy as set by the Liberals’ highest decision-making body.
Well, that’s one interpretation if the loud protestations of “never, never” from Turnbull cabinet are to be believed.
But are they to be believed?
I think we have earned the right to be cynical and wary when it comes to the COALition and honouring commitments.
It’s no secret that this Government hates the ABC and would love to see it sold off. The Minister for Communication, Senator Fifield, has demonstrated his loathing of the national broadcaster in a series of vexatious, but nevertheless damaging, complaints. The Government stripped out over $100 million in funding to the ABC in the 2018 Budget, forcing cuts in news and other divisions. The appointment of former Murdoch executive Michelle Guthrie as managing director is also widely seen as a Trojan horse for dismantling the ABC.
None of us should be surprised if the Dutton/Turnbull Government moves to chop up the ABC if it wins the next Federal election.
The take out from this is that either way, democratic processes – both inside and outside of party structures – are a sham, a veil of decency to give a shred of respect to an otherwise broken, decrepit and corrupt system.
And, just so you don’t think I’m being one-eyed about this, the ALP deserves some criticism in this area, too.
In May this year, the so-called “left” unions (a block of bureaucrats and careerists) procedurally shut down the Victorian conference of the ALP so that a motion on ending offshore detention of refugees could not be debated. But it’s actually worse than that: motions on several key issues were blocked by the suspension of business.
On Sunday the industrial left teamed up with the Labor right to close the Victorian state conference, shutting down urgency motions on live exports, gender inequality in superannuation, closure of offshore detention centres, the right to strike, the rate of Newstart and recognition of Palestine.
The same grouping also combined to vote against senators being preselected by an equal vote of rank-and-file members and affiliated union delegates to state conference.
How is this different in principle to the Liberal leadership ignoring the wishes of the rank-and-file over privatising the ABC?